🔬 Science 2d ago · John Timmer

Most of our measures of a key cognitive process don't agree

Ars Technica Science
Ars Technica science
View Channel →
Most of our measures of a key cognitive process don't agree
Source ↗ 👁 3 💬 0
It's widely acknowledged that it's nearly impossible to publish negative results in scientific journals. "We didn't see anything" is a much harder sell than finding that a hypothesis is clearly right. Findings of no effect tend to either be shuffled off to low-profile journals or left behind as unpublished lab lore.
The high-profile journal Nature, however, made a notable exception this week, publishing a study that tells us that a bunch of methods we have been using to try to measure a key emot

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the discussion

More Like This

NASA Announces X-70 Experimental Aircraft to Advance Flight Research 
NASA · 4h ago
📰
2026 election results show widespread opposition to AI data centers
Scientific American Content: Global · 6h ago
NASA Shares Plans to Accelerate Artemis, Return to Moon
NASA · 8h ago
📰
The Super El Niño is already soaking the U.S. Expect more flooding to come
Scientific American Content: Global · 10h ago
This self-powered toothbrush makes electricity to kill cavity-causing bacteria
Latest from Live Science · 10h ago
Sam Altman Makes Weird Tweet After Bruising Midterm Results
Futurism · 11h ago